Jon Stewart: Media Should be Powerful tool of Illumination
Last night, Jon Stewart had CNBC’s Jim Cramer on The Daily Show for an interview that was cleverly introduced as a sendup of the contrived drama seen on mainstream TV news shows.
But as soon as the interview began, Stewart was serious – the hard-hitting journalist speaking real truth to power. His entire effort should be a lesson for all journalists, because it reminds us what real journalism looks like.
Real journalism is evident in the actions of people who do their research, find the facts, and relentlessly pursue truthful answers – all without telling you they’re doing it in a cheap attempt to make you think they’re on your side. I’m wary of anybody who has to advertise what they’re doing with slogans like “Fair and Balanced”, show titles like “No Bias, No Bull”, and segment titles like “Keeping Them Honest” – as if I’m not smart enough to get it just by watching them in action.
On the Huffington Post, Jake Coyle says:
He claimed CNBC shirked its journalistic duty by believing corporate lies, rather than being an investigative “powerful tool of illumination.” And he alleged CNBC was ultimately in bed with the businesses it covered – that regular people’s stocks and 401Ks were “capitalizing on your adventure.”
Responding to Coyle’s article, commenter Sons says:
Stewart won himself a very high perch in vital national matters tonight. He spoke brilliantly for the vast, vast majority of Americans who have been so damaged by this financial crisis.
In a piece titled And a Comic Shall Lead Them, James Moore writes:
Analysts doing the autopsy on newspaper reporting and the corpse of mainstream journalism are constantly lamenting the fact that so many young people and an increasing number of others are getting their news from Jon Stewart and Comedy Central.
Where else is there left to look for thoughtful, analytical, and insightful analysis of the issues of our day? The yuks are just a bonus. Cable news shows can proclaim “no bias, no bull” all they want but every story is framed for a purpose, which is drama and conflict.
Unfortunately for traditional journalism, the audience increasingly realizes that much of the material presented is manufactured controversy that requires no resolution. Stewart, though, gives us the laconic and wiseass view of the day’s news and nothing he says seems contrived. Strangely, his entire broadcast is a contrivance and yet it remains the most enlightening in the spectrum of TV “news.”
Responding to Moore’s piece, commenter arkansasgirl says:
Jon Stewart is my hero. I know how uncomfortable it must be to speak truth to power (not that Jim Cramer is all that powerful, but the Wall Street and bank interests he represents are), but God knows we desperately need someone who has a national forum to do just that. The mainstream media is never going to do it.
During Friday’s White House briefing, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs was asked about the exchange, and the reporter asking the question referred to Stewart’s work as serious journalism:
Share Jon Stewart: Media Should be Powerful tool of IlluminationSomewhat more surprising was the fact that the reporter who asked Gibbs about the Cramer interview referred to Stewart’s work as “serious journalism.” That it was good reporting by the “Daily Show” host is indisputable. That professional journalists are in awe of a comedian is telling.



Email
Twitter

Gary Hilson says:
Mar 13th, 2009
Great roundup of coverage. As a former journalist, it depresses me that Stewart is one of the few people who actually tell it like it is.
Mary says:
Mar 16th, 2009
What prompted me to read this article was this remark made by the author of this article.
“I’m wary of anybody who has to advertise what they’re doing with slogans like “Fair and Balanced”, show titles like “No Bias, No Bull”, and segment titles like “Keeping Them Honest” – as if I’m not smart enough to get it just by watching them in action.”
I’ve heard those phrases many times, as they are made by journalists that I watch and listen to, and their remarks ring true to me, and I’d like to let the author of this article know that hell yes I am a FOX news fan, but apparantly he or she is not. (???)
Now, would someone please let me know the name of the journalist that wrote this article, as I seem to be not only stupid, referring to his/her remark, but apparently I am also blind, because I do not see the name of the author of this article anywhere. Why?
Doesn’t that remark this journalist made then put he/she into the same catagory he/she is complaining about? I’m still LMAO and in the back of my mind I’m wondering if the author of this article doesn’t also works for Comedy Central, and they need to plug their show. Maybe buying stock in that company might make us all some money. LOL
As you might be able to tell, I do not watch Comedy Central, nor do I think Jon Stewart is funny in any way, except for his attempt to sound intelligent in the political forum, and to now have so many claim that he is the journalist that tells the truth, now that is true comedy! And as this author claims; “hard-hitting journalist speaking real truth to power. His entire effort should be a lesson for all journalists, because it reminds us what real journalism looks like”… well, that must be the answer that all of us dumb folk need to know… watch Jon Stewart and Comedy Central for real, true, hard hitting journalism that is truthful! Dang this is funny!
Who ever wrote this article, I thank you for the best laugh I’ve had in a long time.
Terence says:
Jul 13th, 2009
Stewart Mader writes all articles on this site and owns it. He says that at the footer of the site and in the upper right text.
Jon Stewart is a comedian, and does not attempt to sound intelligent. He attempts to make people laugh.
The some of the hosts on Fox who use those jingo’s are not trained journalists, and anyone can tell.