Close to the tipping point? Interview with Jemima Gibbons
A couple of weeks ago, I had a great interview with Jemima Gibbons, who runs the award-winning iKnowHow consultancy in the UK. She wrote a great post about the interview, and I wanted to share with you the section where we discussed five things I think about when I work with organizations on wiki adoption:
…now Stewart runs a company called “Grow Your Wiki” which helps clients (the majority of them Fortune 500 companies) navigate their ways through the potentially murky waters of corporate social media.
The issues Stewart comes across are “social, cultural and generational”. He defines his key concerns as follows:
1. For people who’ve worked in organisations for a decade or more, they think ‘oh there’s this army of [younger] tech savvy people coming in’ and, for that older generation, they find they don’t pick up the tools so easily so you get a fair amount of fear and frustration. One of the things I like to do is champion mutual mentoring. So you get the older person with the wealth of experience about the organisation, and the younger person with the technical knowhow, and they help each other.
2. Employees hear all the popular cultural obsessions around Wikipedia and become concerned about all wikis being a free-wheeling anarchic mess. I have a very complex opinion of Wikipedia – it’s created a massive misconception around what a wiki can be. Wikipedia is totally open, with no security around it. People look at Wikipedia and think they don’t want that within their organisation. But wiki use inside an organisation and Wikipedia are two completely separate worlds. Giving concrete examples of wikis that work inside organisations makes a lot of difference.
3. Rank and file employees are often afraid that if they put all their knowledge into a wiki, they won’t be needed any more but the opposite is true. If you hold onto your knowledge, all you are is an overpaid security guard. Once you start sharing your knowledge and collaborating with other people you become more valuable to your company. You’re more likely to have your job outsourced when you’re not contributing knowledge.
4. Senior management is largely changing right now. At Enterprise 2.0 in Boston there were a number of senior execs (Wachovia, CIA, IBM, SAP, Chevron, University of Helsinki) talking of the promotion of web 2.0 throughout their companies. The embracing of tools is there. The question is not should we use these but how can we optimise these? Two years ago it was different. I think we’re close to a tipping point.
5. Cultural change is necessary. The ideal is to run a pilot with a group of employees and pass on lessons from that. Successful wiki adoption happens at the lunch table. If you chat to a guy you have lunch with every day and he talks about using the wiki and says ‘meetings are shorter, we’re getting more done’, that creates real change.













Hans says:
Oct 21st, 2008
We’ve used #5 quite a bit without officially ‘launching a pilot’ per se. For example on a large project that had multiple people identifying action items and then addressing them (more than 100 to date) we started with an email solution that had everyone constantly trying to figure out which version was the latest punch list.
When we put it on a shared spreadsheet everyone could go about the business of completing action items rather than managing them. Er, I guess that’s technically not a wiki, but it’s a shared online resource that anyone in the project can edit and contribute to, so that’s kind of the same thing.
Cultural change is pretty swift when a new tool makes the job easier.